What world to shift to?

Comment

Comment by Robert Short on January 14, 2010 at 9:26am

Ferdinand, thank you very much for taking the time to view the site and certainly your response. Not it’s not a walk in the park at all but you did see the how the Vikipedia Mosaic works -

1) to explain the technology
2) bring people, like you, together with other individuals, groups and organizations to define and create a new vision.
3) to model, test & deploy a knowledgebase driven civilization & flashforward

The world is about to be given a new world order proposition and all will choose!

More images:
I am presently going through the threading of the Vikipedia Mosaics adding images and defining the governance operatic. At this time the entire operatic for local/community/county/providence governance called Community Governance Executive Registry is being defined in the Mosaic - about three more days to finish up and then move to regional/state and so on. Community content is placed in a secured with open records public access called Community Information Trust

To use your terminology - at this stage in its deployment Vikipedia Mosaic is targeted as a social system to engineer a cultural, economic and rights sphere. The human sphere, so to speak, is placed in what is called the Information Trust which is a secured central location for personal, public and proprietary content. It is from the trust that you [the owner of the information] control exposure, expression, express rights and access to certain information. The personal content expression and access depends on its application – for example, if a person is on certain strong medications should the governance be notified to restrict the access to vehicle operators. In this model – does one person have the right to risk the live of others while others have greater rights to rights of life and to reduce risk of injury?

Integration:
This system can actually set on-top of existing SQL database structures making it more plug-n-play content aware.

Yes, we can model, test and deploy systems for a seven yeard flashforward by at least 20 years compared to our present stage of progression

Glad you like it and hope you make a contribution - build it and they will come.

Comment by Ferdinand Zanda on January 14, 2010 at 2:41am

Johannes could you copy and past that onto the separate Blog I created?

Comment by Ferdinand Zanda on January 13, 2010 at 10:38pm

Of course, your right. On the other hand we live in a complex world. And co-creating this or shifting to an other way of living means we have to do something. I've come up with this and started a Blog about it.

As an individual human being gifted with creative power I hereby declare that I am depending on the world we live in therefore I have like every other human being the right on an equal part of it's resources and in freedom I take on the responsibility to live up to this declaration.

Comment by Ferdinand Zanda on January 13, 2010 at 5:43am

It, is certainly not a walk in the park. But very interesting. Luckily you added some pictures. You should put more of them online. While studying your work I find it difficult to understand how it works. But I get the feeling that for the things I'm working on this could be of great help.
Back to the topic. What world to shift to? As I see it we should make exact fantasies about this. And here your system comes in. Because it's based on geometry (exact) and phenomenology (the speaking of exact pictures to ones intuition) it's perfectly fit to put these fantasies into.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
The software system makes it possible to look at the exact fantasies from a 3d perspective. And it's active so the 'real life' result can be studied, we can speed up time to look at the outcome of certain 'events' and so on. It's like an advanced piece of paper. Were we can draw our fantasies on from a 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd person perspective. This way we can share and fine tune it. It allows us to put our minds together, do thinking and research on the world we would like to shift to before we really do it. This way we can prevent error's in creating the new world.
Oh, man I'm all exited about it. There is a lot of potential in your system.

Is it possible to make a basic model of the world, or some of it's systems in your system? Does this need to be a three fault always? Is it fit to describe a human in it, as body, soul and spirit? Or society like a system of a cultural sphere, an economic sphere and a rights sphere? (all relatively autonomous and interacting with each other through the collective of individuals living in it)
Can different systems be integrated? For instance, to put a set of humans in the social system (in fact they form the social system)?

Comment by Robert Short on January 12, 2010 at 11:23am

The combination of spiritual knowledge and technology is certainly as must as we have left humanity out of the humane domain. Among the many items art is what seperates us from animals as well as forming concepts and systems.

Your quote of "It's all about local semi independent communities which can look after themselves", I see those as systems also - only localized. Centralization verses decentrailization, value added verses distributed processes remain strong consideration when tending to the needs of 6B+ people regarding water, food and medical care although an equilibrium is obtainable under the right processes and systems approach. This is my technology official Qaaba (SI) website which is actually a construction based upon art (geometric) and phenomenology (number). My project is no walk in the park when it comes to understanding it as a technology - but what if you could define, explain or provide the knowledge thereof of something and it disseminate into software systems? Thus, the Vikipedia Mosaic Knowledgebase for local, regional, national and global systems modeling, testing and deployment.

I took the red pill and the world is not in Kansas anymore and has gone bye-bye.

What world to shift to? I suggest knowledgebase driven communities and building an economic infrastructure (and convergence thereof) mans' targeting of a type one civilization. It's all about systems :)

Comment by Ferdinand Zanda on January 12, 2010 at 3:33am

I agree with you on the systems part. I'm working with the combination of spiritual knowledge and technology. And what i'm finding on this road that it's about art. We need an artistic approach. The systems we make should be works of art. Just like nature is.
We have to be careful not to rely to heavily on systems. We can use it as a tool. In this whole shift thinking there is an eye for that. It's all about local semi independent communities which can look after themselves. And I think it's wonderful the effort you put in all this. Especially because you are looking for the connection and the benefit for all.
Just like profit, ego isn't bad. We just need to take things in our own hands and don't let it out of control. The same is with systems. Again the only way to do this is the individual. If we can accomplish the independence of the individual within independent groups of people we won't rely to heavily on a system. And when there is a failure it won't be total.
Terrorism is a bad thing but we can also learn from it. The way it is organized makes it invulnerable for it's enemies. And that is like you say. Solutions have always been under our very eyes but somehow they become discredited. As you, I see the purpose in this as well. It is a training program for positive thinking. No matter how bad, wrong, ugly or difficult something is, it is a gift to humanity as a whole and the individual specifically, to have the power to see the positive side of things.
This doesn't mean the problems or the ugliness aren't real. But it shows us that people have the power to turn wrong into right. And to be the light. This is something everyone can experience. Who was that? Showing this to us? Oh yes I know it was Neo in The Matrix. Or.... Oh yes it was the one who also said don't follow me.

Be like him. You are already an individual human being so what are you waiting for?

Comment by Robert Short on January 12, 2010 at 2:38am

I can adapt to the semantics meanwhile my friends call me a beautiful mind so at times I can be difficult to understand. Actually I have thought many times that my achievements accumulated to date could not have been obtained without those certain eccentricities. I had not considered a global declaration to such exactness although I am considering a global citizenry which would be a rank and file type orgainization. Therefore a declaration will be required.

I have spent 30 years in research and development to obtain a certain documented artifact that is clinedestined to bring world peace. I achieved the decoding of the oracles, scrolls and texts and have constructed the technology. The technology is years ahead of modern day commonplace achievements. Unfortunately, around 95AD it was given a bad review and is so embedded in religious dogma but I see the purpose of that as well.

From where I sit, everything is about systems and it is by a systems approach that a global realignment of goals can be established. My objective is to set man on the path to becoming a type one civilization which suggests that man achieves sustainability of all global resources plentifully and lives in harmony with the environment. At this time in the technological progression of the project I am structuring the building of the knowledgebase for global deployment. Thus, the Vikipedia Mosaic Knowledgebase which is the catalyst for deploying a knowledgebase driven civilization. It is a massive goal but you must realize that I have already had a massive achievement. I am pulling all such projects targeting efficiencies and change into a collaborative scheme - so far so good.

I agree, we must come together. There is no instant solution, no drive up window or take out for global change. For the most part I find people only temporarily attentitive to the tasks and few ever put any real time or effort toward such an idea.

Comment by Ferdinand Zanda on January 12, 2010 at 12:04am

My dear Robert, these eccentricities I take for granted. I belief a dialogue is more fruitful than a discussion. I put trust in you, myself and all others on the internet to have the capability and the power to cope with it. You are right, i'm not familiar with the declaration of independence. Of course I know of it's existence. It's something like our 'ground law' or the universal declaration of human rights. And these I have studied. Thank you for making me aware of this one. I like it's name. Independence is what it's all about. But I mean this on an individual level.
When I hear guard, I think of fear. And than I think of children. Do you know the comic of Calvin and Hobbes with the monsters under the bed?

-I read this and I don't like the sound, it's not my purpose to be not nice, or offend you, so I read the declaration now-

Now I've read it, it's a whole lot different than the other declarations I've studied. But in my humble opinion although this document put's power to the people in writing it also constitutes something else. In the first sentence there is the word seperation. I am sorry but that is a problem for me. We need to come together. That's also why I don't like discussion and choose dialogue instead.
So I can go on but in my opinion also this declaration of independence, although it helped to build a great nation and it was fruitful to the American people, and in all respect helped Europe in the outcome of the world wars, it now isn't anymore. In the end it has contributed to the mess the world is in right now.
So I think it's time for a new declaration of independence on an individual basis. There you will not have the problem of separation because more separated than that and there is no more individual. This also deals with guarding freedom. But not with a massive army which can be misused for other things than guarding alone.
It's time to fight the enemy within. To fight our ego's and fears ourselves and to become independent of other people in that respect, growing up you could call it. People are doing this already. And yes we can help each other. We should. And for that I would like to see a declaration. One which I can use as a tool, to judge myself, to have a basis on which I can act and come to understanding with other people.
To build a new world upon or to change the old one into a better place for every individual human being. Everybody should be free (and with that comes responsibility), have real equal rights and join hands.

Or as the French say: Liberté, égalité, fraternité

Comment by Robert Short on January 11, 2010 at 8:07pm

Ferdinand;

My apology I should have checked your nationality prior to entering this "dialog". I thought you were an American which explains why you did not recognize "guard", "object" or "throw off". Regardless, the agreement spoken of is called the Declaration of Independence. In the United States of America the document is an instrument that helps assure our freedom against tyrants. I provided a link to the document in my Vikipedia. I am careful about entering "dialog" with others as I have certain eccentricities beyond my control.

Comment by Ferdinand Zanda on January 11, 2010 at 2:23pm

And about ethics and character, are they teachable? That of course is a matter of opinion. I have worked with children, I have worked as a technician with a telecom company. I did a lot of soul searching. And I come to the conclusion that it is not teachable. I think character and ethics are a fundamental part of a human's self. I think they can be developed though. There are ways and this is up to the parents and the teacher to develop ones character and ethics.
Let me give an example. This may sound a bit strange. Just read it, don't judge it today but if you like tomorrow.
When you teach children to write one should use white paper, without lines. As you will know it is more difficult to write straight, keep the letters the same size or keep the same margin. But with patience and care they will learn. Some children can do it easily and for others it is a long struggle. Now to learn writing in this way has to do with developing morality later on in life. Because you need to develop something straight in yourself.

To make things clear, I don't say that someone can't write straight doesn't have morality, that's not the point I'm making here. Think about this today. and come back to me tomorrow.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page